WASHINGTON DC, Jul 23 (IPS) – Immediately, we face a rising and unprecedented array of nuclear weapons risks. On the similar time, this yr’s presidential election can also be unprecedented, unpredictable, and very consequential.
Amid geopolitical divides, arms competitors, more and more harmful new applied sciences and an elevated nuclear threat, UN Secretary-Common Antonio Guterres highlighted his concern that the UN Convention on Disarmament is persistently failing to ship. February 2024
Historical past reveals that U.S. presidential management is without doubt one of the most necessary elements figuring out whether or not the nuclear hazard will rise or fall. Maybe probably the most basic accountability of a U.S. president, who has the only authority to order the usage of nuclear weapons, is to keep away from occasions that might result in a nuclear warfare.
Sadly, mainstream marketing campaign information protection has paid scant consideration to how the Republican nominee, Donald Trump, and the Democratic Celebration nominee plan to handle one in every of, if not the, most severe threats to U.S. and worldwide safety. That should change.
Given what’s at stake, the candidates’ approaches to the nuclear weapons menace deserve extra scrutiny.
The Arms Management Affiliation (ACA) and Arms Management Immediately will, in our capability as a nonpartisan public training group, be working onerous to focus on the nuclear weapons challenges that U.S. presidential and congressional candidates should responsibly tackle.
American voters are more and more conscious and, in keeping with latest polling, deeply involved about nuclear weapons risks. A 2024 national opinion survey found that a majority of Americans believe that nuclear weapons make the world extra harmful. Total, simply 13 % assume nuclear weapons are making the world a safer place, whereas 63 % assume the other, and 14 % say neither.
One other problem: except the following U.S. president can productively interact Russia and China on nuclear threat discount and arms management measures, we may see all three states partaking in an unconstrained and really harmful nuclear arms race.
Ominously, some congressional leaders and members of the nuclear weapons institution are already proposing a significant buildup of deployed U.S. nuclear forces for the primary time in additional than three a long time.
The Heritage Basis, in its now notorious Mission 2025 report, requires ramping up the U.S. nuclear modernization program by including extra nuclear warheads to missiles, fielding extra nuclear-capable bombers, and deploying nuclear-armed cruise missiles at sea.
As I wrote within the lead article of the July/August issue of Arms Control Today, such an enlargement can be pointless, counterproductive, and prohibitively costly. Extra nuclear weapons won’t improve deterrence capabilities or enhance U.S. safety. Nuclear arms management presents the simplest, sturdy, and accountable path to scale back the quantity, position, and dangers of nuclear weapons.
One other public opinion survey performed by the polling firm IPSOS within the fall of 2023 reveals that the following president would have sturdy U.S. well-liked help for nuclear arms management efforts with Russia and China. The ballot indicated that 86% of respondents help nuclear arms management with Russia, with solely 14% opposed; it additionally confirmed 88% help arms management with China, with solely 12% opposed.
Daryl G. Kimball is Govt Director, Arms Management Affiliation, Washington DC
Supply: Arms Management Immediately
© Inter Press Service (2024) — All Rights ReservedOriginal source: Inter Press Service
International Points Information with Newsmaac
